[Zope3-dev] Containment constraints
Jim Fulton
jim@zope.com
Thu, 12 Jun 2003 10:07:50 -0400
Steve Alexander wrote:
>
...
>> Note that most of these constraints are expressed as allowable
>> combinations of interfaces. Also, we'll often want to add constraints
>> to sub-types.
>
>
> Do you think we need more arbitrary constraints too? It would be nice if
> we didn't...
I suspect that arbitrary constraints are needed for edge cases. These might be
best handled through lower-level mechanisms, like custom movers or
subscribers.
> What about an IFlame object can be added only to a message thread of an
> IMetaDiscussionBoard, but not to a message thread of an IDiscussionBoard.
:)
> In this case, the constraint would be about the context of the location
> an object is to be added, not just the location.
> We can work around this case by making the (otherwise identical) message
> thread types have different marker interfaces: IMessageThread,
> IMetaMessageThread.
Right.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:jim@zope.com Python Powered!
CTO (703) 361-1714 http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org