[Zope3-dev] RFC: Local Component Management Simplification

[Dominik Huber]

Jim Fulton wrote:

> Dominik Huber wrote:
>
>> Jim Fulton wrote:
>>
>>> I've updated the proposed APIs. I changed wording from "provide" to 
>>> "register"
>>> as "unprovide" doesn't make sense. (This also conglicts less with 
>>> existing APIs.)
>>
>>
>>
>> I like the new wording. Do you offer the new wording within the zapi 
>> too?
>
>
> I'd prefer to get rid of zapi.  Back when we used context wrappers,
> there were a lot more dead chickens in our code that zapi helped
> to manage.  I personally never (well almost never) use zapi anymore.
>
> I would say that, in general, indirection is bad.  In many cases,
> indirection is also good.  It should only be used when the good of
> a particular indirection significantly outweighs the bad.  IMO,
> the benefits of zapi don't outweight it's inherent obfuscation.

+1, but then I have to change my question. Do you reflect the new 
wording within zope.component too?

zope.component.registerAdapter
...

and deprecate the old ones eventually
zope.component.provideAdapter
...

Regards,
Dominik