[Zope3-dev] Correction to RFC

[Christian Theune]

On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 18:46 -0200, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 09:37:03PM +0100, Christian Theune wrote:
> | Is it intentional that there is a distinction? It took me quite a while
> | to actually notice that minore difference and come to the conclusion
> | that there are two different mechanisms used.
> 
> There's a proposal from Shane Hathaway to remove this distinction, as
> I understand it. It might have been accepted already, and he had code
> ready to checkin.

I found the proposal you're referring to. I don't think this tackles the
issue I found. 

Shane is talking about the event log copies of the tracebacks, not the
error page shown to the browser.

-- 
gocept gmbh & co. kg - forsterstraße 29 - 06112 halle/saale - germany
www.gocept.com - ct at gocept.com - phone +49 345 122 9889 7 -
fax +49 345 122 9889 1 - zope and plone consulting and development
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope3-dev/attachments/20060127/41e72c3f/attachment.bin