[Zope3-dev] Re: Some thoughts on Zope 3, Zope 3 applications,
and Zope 3 instances
Martijn Faassen
faassen at startifact.com
Sat Jan 6 07:19:21 EST 2007
Jim Fulton wrote:
> Martijn Faassen wrote:
[snip]
>> Just splitting stuff up into little flexible pieces won't attract
>> people. If our goal is to attract Zope 3 developers we need to make it
>> easy to get started. We can also say that Zope 3 is componentized and
>> flexible and all that, and this will attract developers too, but if
>> the first bit is too hard all our talk about flexibility will lead to
>> nothing.
>>
>> So, we need to do both: make it easy to get started, and
>> componentizing for greater flexibility later. If we just do the first,
>> we make Zope 2 style mistakes and end up with a monolithic system that
>> should be easier to develop with. If we just do the latter, we make
>> Zope 3 style mistakes and end up with a well componentized system that
>> isn't used a lot.
>
> Agreed, we need both. We should understand though that the thing I'm
> calling (soley for the sake of discussion) is probably not a good
> starting point.
I think I miss a word here; the thing you're calling what?
> IMO, it could be if someone was working on it.
> I also think that it would be a find project on it's own. Or maybe
> there's another project that would serve better. I don't know.
I'm trying to understand what you're referring to here. :)
Anyway, I think Grok is one concrete project that's making it a lot
easier to get started with Zope 3 technology.
Regards,
Martijn
More information about the Zope3-dev
mailing list