[Zope3-dev] Re: RFC: Known working sets
Jim Fulton
jim at zope.com
Thu Sep 6 10:04:56 EDT 2007
On Sep 6, 2007, at 4:02 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
> Martin Aspeli wrote:
>>>>> Jim Fulton wrote:
>>>>>> I'm very much against making setuptools *more* complicated
>>>>>> than it already is.
>>>>> Indeed, but surely managing "known good" sets of components
>>>>> comes under its remit of version management?
>>>> Sure. It does this via requirements.
>>>
>>> Ok, forgive me for being dumb then, but why are we looking to add
>>> similar to zc.buildout?
>> We're talking more about a general pattern in zc.buildout. The
>> deficiencies of using setup.py for this alone are described well
>> in the original proposal.
>
> Yup, and this was the reason for my original question to Jim: why
> do something in zc.buildout rather than fixing the problems with
> setuptools?
Because neither the problem nor the fix are well understood, imo, and
setuptools is already too complicated.
Perhaps the same could be said about buildout, but no new buildout
features are needed to experiment with the issue at this point.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:jim at zope.com Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714 http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
More information about the Zope3-dev
mailing list