[Zope3-Users] Re: Next steps...

[Chris Withers]

Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> I wouldn't say that. It depends on your taste, really. I personally
> prefer the package-includes approach for development environments; for
> actual deployments I find having no package-includes at all, but instead
> putting everything in site.zcml useful, because it's easier to see in
> one place what's included and what not.

I certainly prefer this ;-)

That said, I do like Apache 2 - on - Debian's a2enmod, a2dismod, 
a2ensite and a2dissite. If Zope had equivalents, I'd probably flip round 
to the other view...

Chris

-- 
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
            - http://www.simplistix.co.uk