[Zope3-Users] Re: Using dotted package names

[Philipp von Weitershausen]

George Lee wrote:
>> That entirely depends on how independent you want to keep philikon.a 
>> from philikon.b. But that question also arises when having just a and b.
> 
> Is it possible/typical/advised to have a base set of functionality in philikon,
> and then be developing separate packages philikon.a and philikon.b down the line
> that use philikon?

Not really. 'philikon' is a namespace package, that means it doesn't 
have any functionality of its own. You'd have to make something like 
'philikon.base'.