[Zope3-Users] zope.intid and UUIDs

Martin Aspeli optilude at gmx.net
Thu Apr 19 13:28:21 EDT 2007




Derek Richardson-2 wrote:
> 
> We've talked a lot about the composition alternative to my idea, but we 
> haven't talked about my idea much. What is suboptimal with the way I'm 
> proposing, other than that it requires changing zope core? Or is that a 
> good enough reason to not do it?
> 

Where does the BaseId base class live? If it lives in zope.app.intid you
still have a hard dependency on that, and composition may make more sense,
because it allows you to benefit from an override of the intid
implementation, for example.

It doesn't seem important enough to me to justify a brand new package for
bundling with Zope just to avoid such a dependency.

Plus, using composition means you don't need to sync your  own releases code
Zope releases.

Martin

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/zope.intid-and-UUIDs-tf3597738.html#a10082722
Sent from the Zope3 - users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



More information about the Zope3-users mailing list