[Zpt] nocall: or not to nocall:

Evan Simpson evan@digicool.com
Thu, 15 Mar 2001 16:21:49 -0500


From: "Todd Coram" <todd@digicool.com>
> Remember 'nocall:'.  Is it still valid?

Yes, as in the example given in the spec (getting an iterator).  The reason
for making 'nocall:' the special case, rather than adding '()' for call (or
some such syntax) is that I was hard pressed to come up with even that one
example of a path for which you would want to suppress calling.

Cheers,

Evan @ digicool