From: "Todd Coram" <todd@digicool.com> > Remember 'nocall:'. Is it still valid? Yes, as in the example given in the spec (getting an iterator). The reason for making 'nocall:' the special case, rather than adding '()' for call (or some such syntax) is that I was hard pressed to come up with even that one example of a path for which you would want to suppress calling. Cheers, Evan @ digicool