[ZPT] Are PageTemplateFiles restricted code?

[Juan David Ibáñez Palomar]

Evan Simpson wrote:
> Michael R. Bernstein wrote:
> 
>> BTW, at what point (and in what forum) was this design decision made?
> 
> 
> No formal decision was made; I made them quickly, in the easiest way I 
> could, and rationalized the result later.
> 
>> I can see the advantages of this decision the more I think about it, but
>> the inconsistency with DTMLFile still bothers me, as it erects another
>> barrier to migration of developers from DTML to TAL (at least for
>> products). In return, we get greater convenience for skinning, but I'm
>> not sure the tradeoff was worth it.
> 
> 
> It would certainly be possible to have a constructor argument (or 
> separate class) to relax the restrictions, but it's not trivial to do.
> 


This only helps people that uses the CMF, and is a real problem for
Python product developers. By default it should be unrestricted code.

Please, could you give some clues to develop an unrestricted class?
Then I could change the "LocalPageTemplateFile" of the Localizer
product to unrestricted, after all that's the one I use.


Cheers,
jdavid