[ZPT] Add 'parity' to repeat?

[Evan Simpson]

Shane Hathaway wrote:
> Uh-oh, I'm not sure I know how to read "int:parity".  Does "int:" look 
> up an adapter?  Maybe the adapter ought to be called something like 
> "numutil".

Probably.  This is the kind of thing that makes me want to resolve the 
whole declaration-of-prefix issue, so I can punt on thinking of a short 
yet evocative name, and just bind "standard_integer_series_functions" to 
'n' when I need it :-)

> FWIW, it occurred to me the other day that the use of a double colon 
> might be a little clearer.

Bleh.  Not that I care strongly, but it feels gratuitous.

DBTab integration into 2.7 rocks, BTW.

Cheers,

Evan @ 4-am