[Zug-sig] Goals for the SIG
Chris Calloway
cbc at unc.edu
Wed Nov 14 15:55:47 EST 2007
Tres Seaver wrote:
> - Increase visibility of Zope-related user groups (including Plone
> groups, Python groups willing to hear talks on Zopish topics, etc.)
> on the zope.org web presence, and on the web as a whole (ZUG
> web ring, maybe?)
+1
> - Share ideas, materials, etc. for user group meetings, local
> conferences, etc.
+1
> - Coordinate events among groups related by geography or interest.
+100
> - Provide a sort of "speakers bureau" catalog, listing folks who are
> willing and able to speak before user groups. I know from running
> UGs myself that the chair or program person is perpetually short
> of speakers, and that managing somehow to have an interesting
> speaker, month in and month out, is key to growing the group.
+1
> Thoughts?
I think a lot of this can be done through zope.org.
Granting those local roles on the UG page will be a start.
My ZPUG used to publicize itself, share materials, coordinate, etc.,
through zope.org. One of our members had a wiki page for our ZPUG in his
zope.org folder. We all contributed to it.
When NZO came along, our ZPUG content was migrated. But it was no longer
shared beyond the owner of the folder and he had no way within his
control to change the permissions that we knew of.
So we made our own independent web site. But that disconnected us from
the Zope community at large unless we made extra efforts to republish
our meeting information on zope.org in addition to our own site. We kind
of drifted away from zope.org except for the occasional meeting
announcement reposted there when somebody had the time and energy.
I just went to zope.org and created a new wiki page in my folder. Then I
created a new dummy zope.org user. The new dummy user is not able to
edit my wiki page. Effectively, it's a one person wiki, just like our
old user group wiki.
So this is something about NZO which has bothered me from the start.
zope.org is no longer a community collaboration site which could do
things like foster the sort of interaction between user groups you are
proposing.
There are a couple of links off the zope.org navbar to wiki.zope.org. On
that subdomain there are a couple of B-tree folders of wiki pages, one
for Zope2 and one for Zope3, and 61 other normal folders holding wiki pages.
Only about five of those folders (zope3, ZODB, zope2, grok, and ZPT)
show any significant activity because most of the rest of them do not
have any significantly visible linkage from zope.org. That is, unless
you visit the root of wiki.zope.org, which itself isn't linked anywhere
on zope.org, most content on wiki.zope.org isn't discoverable, and thus
is mighty stale.
There are many places on python.org where folders of wiki pages on
wiki.python.org are linked and seem like a natural part of python.org.
The Python UG page is one of those:
http://wiki.python.org/moin/LocalUserGroups
and is linked from this non-editable page called "Community" on python.org:
http://www.python.org/community/
That kind of seems right to me, that the official python entrance to
"community" links to wiki pages, which are community-editable.
Taking a cue from python.org, I think if wiki.zope.org hosted a folder
called "Community" in which each ZUG could have their own subfolder to
organize as they see fit, and if a link to that folder replaced the
"User Groups" link on the zope.org navbar, would that be sweet? It might
get the Zope community back on the road to using zope.org for community
collaboration. Other content could also go in that top-level community
folder, like speaker's bureau and regional events.
However, wiki.zope.org describes itself as "aim[ing] to be a simple,
comprehensive, community-owned hitch-hiker's guide to all Zope
documentation" and "focused on one thing: efficient zope documentation."
So there is a bit of a disconnect between the intention for
wiki.zope.org (documentation) and our need (community collaboration).
Before I check with Simon Michael to see if he'd be amenable to having
wiki.zope.org host community content other than documentation, and if
he'd create that folder, I wanted to run this by you for feedback.
Because there are flaws with this idea. For instance, wiki pages are
*not* controlled metadata content types with publication workflow. If
you had a meeting announcement, you'd still have to publish it through
someone's personal folder on zope.org in order to get it to syndicate
through the news portlet. And, there is no attachment facility in ZWiki
for hosting/sharing user group presentation materials in more common
presentation formats. Also, anything placed on wiki.zope.org is
automatically claimed under the GFDL, which might not suit the authors
of some meeting presentation materials. In addition, even if this became
available today, I don't think existing ZPUGs are going to stop
maintaining their own websites in favor of posting their announcement
and materials on wiki.zope.org (that is, we need something which
consumes feeds and it syndicable itself).
Those flaws might only be resolved by getting some sort of collaborative
facility built back into zope.org, like a sharing tab with local roles.
I think zope.org is built on Plone 2.0.x, whereas the sharing tab didn't
make it into Plone until Plone 2.1.x. Migration of Plone sites from
2.0.x to 2.1.x or higher is also not trivial, especially after even the
slightest degree of customization. I've heard rumblings that zope.org
might be headed for an overhaul again, anyway.
--
Sincerely,
Chris Calloway
http://www.seacoos.org
office: 332 Chapman Hall phone: (919) 962-4323
mail: Campus Box #3300, UNC-CH, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
More information about the ZUG-SIG
mailing list