-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 25. Juni 2007 12:56:08 -0400 Tres Seaver <tseaver@palladion.com> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 25. Juni 2007 13:00:38 +0200 Lennart Regebro <regebro@gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/25/07, Andreas Jung <lists@zopyx.com> wrote:
I think some time early next week (depending on my schedule). OK. I also promised to merge #2153, that gives me time to do that (unless somebody protests). http://zope.org/Collectors/Zope/2153
Back to the original subject...any objections to merge this 2.11 integration branch back on the trunk *with* failing ZClasses tests. Shouldn't the Zope2 trunk be using ZODB 3.8 at this point? And won't we therefore get Jim's fix?
The 2.11 integration branch also uses ZODB 3.8. So merging this branch would bring the Zope 2 trunk together with Zope 3.4 and ZODB 3.8.
Then are the ZClasses tests failing when run standaone on that branch? E.g.:: $ /path/to/python2.4 test.py -s ZClasses Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver@palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGgCoG+gerLs4ltQ4RAnkGAKC0+pU8D/74CUzZQfx4ZcoyYSyO9ACg2F7V jX90087XWXnU6hkBOjyBzgs= =dHsV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----