Max M wrote:
Martin Kretschmar wrote:
Shortly said, the whole set of stupidities in connection with Zope3. It is a pretty bad state for a project, if it looms for years as the followup project on the horizon but in reality isn't one!
It looks like the classical strategic mistake:
Well, I don't agree with this assessment for Zope 3. We needed the freedom to work oput new ideas and patterns. Trying to use existing code would have been a huge distraction. I think that the result proves that we were right. The beauty of our approach is that, having built what we've built, we'll be able to take advantage of that code in the current platform. Jim -- Jim Fulton mailto:jim@zope.com Python Powered! CTO (540) 361-1714 http://www.python.org Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org