-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Baiju M wrote:
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Martijn Faassen <faassen@startifact.com> wrote:
Hi there,
Is anyone interested in maintaining Zope 3?
With Zope 3 I mean:
* the thing with the ZMI - do you care about the ZMI?
* the thing that can be installed as a particular development platform - do you care about the installation story for Zope 3? (as opposed to Grok or your own application's?)
* the thing that has some kind of documentation website - do you care about providing documentation for Zope 3 as opposed to documentation for Grok or individual libraries?
People who are interested in these aspects please speak up, so we can figure out what this all means for the future of Zope 3.
If nobody is interested, we should perhaps stop talking about it entirely. If people are just interested in the ZMI, perhaps we should form a ZMI project.
What I'm *not* talking about is:
* maintaining, documenting and installing Grok.
* maintaining and documenting any particular Zope Toolkit library (outside of those bits that do ZMI-stuff, those aren't supposed to be in the toolkit)
We know people are interested in doing all that.
Does Zope Tookit support building a web application out of the box without relying on Grok, Zope 2 or any other framework ? (I am Ok to use a Buildout for building application from Zope Toolkit packages)
If the answer to this question is "No", then I am interested to maintain the packages necessary to create a simple application out of the box. This is just an academic interest :)
I would say that the answer is "no". Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver@palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJ44d0+gerLs4ltQ4RAimzAJ9fm2W/V8R44AjXoa/wEOmVNWBJ6gCePSkc wJudZQswGVm1IL4ntjPrdnQ= =9ZTG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----