On 3/3/10 12:58 PM, Christian Theune wrote:
I think there is some relevant and important desire that Chris has which actually overlaps with some of thoughts I had lately: organizing the currently 65 packages into categories where larger chunks of packages make sense of being used together to socially encourage re-use doesn't seem bad to me.
Yay.
Or is Chris' characterization of my disagreement with him as "beating" negative feedback. This seems more appropriate to me, but I'm not sure what you mean.
Hmm. I do understand why Chris responded that way, I'm not sure it had to be in response to your post, but I guess that was because your post came in second, otherwise it may have hit Martijn (yet again). But also I'm not going to analyze Chris' feelings sitting over here in my room ... ;)
"There's no crying in software" really, how I feel is irrelevant. ;-) I do wish every mention of change or even something just marginally outside the scope of what is normally discussed here wouldn't be quite as immediately and thoroughly stomped upon. I think it would be useful to have a discussion about grouping some Zope bits along functional lines for marketing purposes. This is really independent of any discussion about the ZTK. - C