30 Apr
2004
30 Apr
'04
5:46 p.m.
On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 13:43, Casey Duncan wrote:
In retrospect I probably should have just marked it as deferred rather than rejected, the idea was more to provoke action (which I did) then to reject it as not-a-bug.
I think there needs to be another category named "wontfix" that doesn't imply that it will ever be fixed like "deferred" seems to. This category should also be selected in the default search settings. - C