29 Nov
2007
29 Nov
'07
1 a.m.
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:52:01 -0800, Philipp von Weitershausen <philipp@weitershausen.de> wrote:
It's actually even more restrictive than that: If I read paragraph 5 of the contributor agreement [1] right, then whoever checks things in must have the intellectual property over the code, otherwise s/he would not be able to donate half of it to ZC. So effectively you can't check in somebody else's code, even if it's covered by the ZPL.
That's correct from a legal point of view. Which is why code in the Collective is a separate repository and isn't covered by the contributor agreement in our particular case. -- Alexander Limi ยท http://limi.net