It sounds like you've done more comprehensive speed testing than we have. Can you share some numbers? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lalo Martins" <lalo@hackandroll.org> To: <zope-dev@zope.org> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 8:42 AM Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] OracleStorage, and possibly others
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 07:02:50AM -0500, Chris McDonough wrote:
Of course it would, for the same reasons as OracleStorage (eg FileStorage/Data.fs is inefficient)
Actually, it's the other way around. OracleStorage is 30-to-50 times slower than FileStorage on writes. Reads are slow too but the slowness is somewhat negated by caching.
Chris, that's only true for small databases. At about 100M of Data.fs, OracleStorage starts being faster. It depends on hardware too. We made some benchmarks on a major Brazilian portal, and well, it's currently running OracleStorage.
Anyway, I said "inefficient", not "slow".
[]s, |alo +---- -- Hack and Roll ( http://www.hackandroll.org ) The biggest site for whatever-it-is-that-we-are.
http://zope.gf.com.br/lalo mailto:lalo@hackandroll.org pgp key: http://zope.gf.com.br/lalo/pessoal/pgp
Brazil of Darkness (RPG) --- http://zope.gf.com.br/BroDar
_______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )