--On 1. Februar 2007 12:31:12 -0500 Chris McDonough <chrism@plope.com> wrote:
On Feb 1, 2007, at 11:59 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 1. Februar 2007 11:01:56 -0500 Chris McDonough <chrism@plope.com> wrote:
How many people would get indignant if I checked in a fix that undeprecated zLOG? Removing the API seems silly, since its just a wrapper around the logging module now anyway.
-0. We could make zLOG available as egg or as downloadable product.
How would a user who got a zLOG import error know they needed to download something unless we leave a stub module and the deprecation warning in forever? Leaving it in and undeprecating it would allow lots of old products to work without any changes or users needing to download anything. This would be a win, IMO. I'm not sure of the goal of deprecating it in the first place.
0, for keeping zLOG for the time being... -1, for undeprecating it. Using Python's logging module should remain the only recommended solution. I don't want to see any new code using zLOG. Andreas