On Wednesday 12 August 2009, Jim Fulton wrote:
I'm not sure why this all has to be computer readable. What is the use case for computer readable knowledge of whether a package is in the kgs or just used to test it? What is the need for computer readable information about where the package is being developed.
We can use such a list to extract more information from included packages. For example, I have a script to extract all CHANGES.txt entries in comparison to an older KGS version. Thus, knowing the list of packages that we consider part of the KGS is very useful beyond testing, for example release management. Regards, Stephan PS: I am still in Germany but will be back home late Sunday to read discussions more carefully. -- Entrepreneur and Software Geek Google me. "Zope Stephan Richter"