On 11/16/2011 11:30 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to revert the removal of the ++skin++ traverser in Zope 4.
As we're working on a replacement ZMI at a sprint currently (more details about that in a bit) we'd like to leverage this feature.
From my perspective, I value that Zope 2/4 has always made some choices upfront that one could leverage right away. Especially as multiple orthogonal components (like: your application and the ZMI) need to leverage this plugin point, I'd rather have this provided by the framework.
I couldn't find an argument anywhere why ++skin++ should be gone.
I'm interpreting the thread overall as an OK to revive the ++skin++ traverser. Thanks, Christian -- Christian Theune · ct@gocept.com gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 0 · fax +49 345 1229889 1 Zope and Plone consulting, development, hosting, operations