27 Apr
2001
27 Apr
'01
8:47 p.m.
Hannu Krosing wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
However, purely random IDs would cause all the buckets to be loaded in memory all the time, so Jim's third idea was to have each client increment sequentially from a random ID and move to a new random ID if conflicts ever occur.
Can't one just assign some unique id to each ZEO client and somehow use _that_ for making up ids ?
It would have the added benefit of knowing which client made up which id.
I suppose, but I don't see much value in that for most ZEO setups, since a browser is not bound to a specific client. Shane