8 Feb
2002
8 Feb
'02
12:27 a.m.
Chris Withers wrote:
seb bacon wrote:
It wouldn't surprise me - ZPT has the roughly the same overheads as DTML for the language parsing, but a presentation template goes through an HTML parser in addition - which is always going to be quite slow in python.
IIRC, The HTML Parser is only used during compilation, not on every render.
I would have thought it'd eb a priority to get ZPT to be at least as fast as DTML...
Last I heard there was a benchmark it said ZPT was about 40% slower than DTML, and they were quite happy about this as DTML does all kinds of funky optimization while ZPT did not. I forget where I read that though, and it was a while ago, and I may not remember that figure right. Regards, Martijn