Previously Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
On 12 Aug 2007, at 21:45 , Tino Wildenhain wrote:
Maybe I missed the thread but why was LP choosen over for example Trac?
Because we don't have to maintain it or host it. I don't think we have the amount of volunteers (feel free to convince me otherwise :)).
The latter would at least work very well with the SVN repository
I'm not sure how far along Trac's multi-project/single-repository integration is. As far as I'm aware, however, Trac would poorly fit our repository structure.
That's not to say I don't like Trac. I've used it and I like it. Plone seems to be able to use it quite well, but they also have people worrying about it and maintaining it constantly.
We haven't needed to touch trac in months actually. Wichert. -- Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net> It is simple to make things. http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.