Re: [Zope-dev] Where does ISite belong conceptually?

Thomas Lotze wrote:

Thomas Lotze wrote:

...

While writing tests for the zope.site.hooks module I'm moving to zope.component, I notice that the module calls getSiteManager() on an site object. Such an object isn't technically required to implement an interface that declares that method, but there is one, or rather a pair of them: IPossibleSite and ISite.

I wonder: should we start requiring that the object passed to setSite() implement (or even be adaptable to) IPossibleSite?

I think the simplest way forward would be not to change the semantics as part of this step. Regards, Martijn