Hi ;) --On Donnerstag, 26. Juli 2001 17:21 +0200 Christian Scholz <cs@comlounge.net> wrote:
Hi!
Hi :-)
--On Donnerstag, 26. Juli 2001 15:51 +0200 Christian Scholz <cs@comlounge.net> wrote:
Hi!
Why do people always mirror? I dont see the advantage in it. If you think about caching, you will see you dont need mirroring at all but can transparently influence which element is complete dynamic and which is somewhat static by sending different expires: header. At least squid can be configured to not let people force reload from outside.
For example: One of my customer wants some snapshot of the site for the archive on CD-ROM... So how do I do that? (without giving them a full Zope install on it which is sometimes even not possible as there are sql databases etc. involved..)
This is hard anyway. Imagine you have many forms or even have content- negotiation running :) So it might be more easy to put a complete Zope on the CD ;)
Well, they don't need the forms for the archive and even not running forms. They are more interested in the content.. But the point is anyway that it should work regardless if it makes sense or not in some situations (IMHO) ;)
Sure, but I think thats not a problem of the server but an issue for the mirror tool. Wget might be a bit simplicistic for this task. There are other options like pavuk for example. Regards :-) Tino