25 Mar
2008
25 Mar
'08
6:26 p.m.
Andreas Jung wrote at 2008-3-24 09:00 +0100:
... Chris favors a 'big' Zope egg with some dependencies (like ZODB) stripped out. I would prefer a more broader approach. One of the reasons are company-internals modifications to the Zope core. Right now we maintain a more or less heavy modified version of Zope 2.8 in our repos (making Zope upgrades pretty hard). A better modularization would help us here.
I object that upgrades are "pretty hard" and I doubt that modularization would help in any way: Upgrades are hard only when local modifications and global ones interfere. This does not happen too often and how often it happens is independent from the modularization. -- Dieter