7 Sep
2008
7 Sep
'08
7:31 p.m.
Andreas Jung wrote:
This is a big issue? I don't think so. Disks are cheap and usually you don't get in touch with the dependent modules under the hood - except for debugging :-)
I don't agree. I think making the dependencies fewer would result is easier re-use of bits of "zope", which grows their community and hopefully ups their quality. If this goes well, we might even see robust seperation of packets making the KGS unnecessary... Chris - well, I can always dream ;-) -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk