13 Jun
2011
13 Jun
'11
7:01 a.m.
* 2011-06-12 22:49, Chris McDonough wrote:
This seems slightly inconsistent with the adaptation worldview imposed by getAdapter/queryAdapter. I think it would be more consistent if "c.queryAdapter(IFoo, foo)" returned foo if foo already implemented IFoo and there was no other more specific adapter registered for the IFoo/foo pair in the registry, no?
+1, way more consistent than returning None. Regards, Fabio