4 Sep
2002
4 Sep
'02
6:40 p.m.
"R. David Murray" <bitz@bitdance.com> writes:
it would be really sad. So if that is a ruling criterion, I'd vote for two versions of structured text, preferably with a translator between them.
Well, it would be easy enough (or maybe not, with current stx code) for structured text to accept either indentation or rST-style underlining to indicate headers. I wonder if it's possible to design a system that doesn't require indentation at all, but allows it as an alternate mechanism - without causing more confusion.