30 Nov
2009
30 Nov
'09
4:50 p.m.
Tres Seaver wrote: [snip]
Do we really have a significant codebase which both needs to adapt tuples *and* uses the interface-calling sugar?
I hope not. That's why I walk all over it breaking backwards compatibility in this plan. We'd need to live with IFoo((a, b)) for a few years as opposed to IFoo(a, b), but if that means we can move forward without breaking a lot of code, I think we should take that hit. Maybe we'll like it enough that we never really need IFoo(a, b) after all. Regards, Martijn