Evan Simpson wrote:
From: Chris Withers <chrisw@nipltd.com>
It looks like REQUEST.steps is the replacement for PARENTS? Is that so?
<snip REQUEST.steps isn't PARENTS replacement> Okay, so given that PARENTS is living in a 'deprecated' list on the Interfaces Wiki, what are we supposed to use instead?!
Agreed. Jim pretty much mandated a name that (1) lives in 'other', rather than being an attribute, and therefore (2) is very, very unlikely to clash with other people's REQUEST variable names.
I know there's gonna be good reason for this, but could someone explain it to me...
"_SUPPRESS_SITEROOT" and/or "_SUPPRESS_ACCESSRULE" into your URL in order to turn off a single SiteAccess object (the one which would have triggered at that point in the URL).
Oooo... is that documented anywhere?
I didn't spend a whole lot of time fortifying it. It's just meant to be an example, after all. I wasn't expecting so many people to paste it into their applications without understanding what it does. :-)
You'd be surprised... ...anyway, I thought you would have remembered given all the fun we had trying to get FTP access to work with SiteAccess ;-) cheers, Chris