29 Nov
2007
29 Nov
'07
7:38 p.m.
Tres Seaver wrote:
Please separate out the dependency problem from NIH: in this case, zope.i18n predates the NIH package by *years* (the i18n support was the topic of the *first* extra-mural Zope3 sprint, in January of 2002).
Actually no, if I understand Philipp's comment correctly, the NIH problem *they* suffered from was because of the dependency problem that zope.i18n suffered from. Given they have a solution without the dependency problems, maybe we should use it? cheers, Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk