On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Fabio Tranchitella <kobold@kobold.it> wrote:
* 2010-03-03 19:59, Chris McDonough wrote:
I think it would be useful to have a discussion about grouping some Zope bits along functional lines for marketing purposes. This is really independent of any discussion about the ZTK.
I wonder if calling zope.{interface,component,schema,configuration,event} the "bicycle repair kit" (note the absence of the word "zope"), with explicit documentation and a dedicated website really need the approval of the whole zope3 community.
Or, better... I don't think anybody can block John Doe to pick up a random set of packages, give them a name and market them as a framework (or as a reusable set of libraries) as long as the name "zope" is not used.
Am I wrong? It's free software, after all.
This thread is primarily for meta (aka flame) discussions. If you're going to discuss something technical, please start a separate thread. :) Jim -- Jim Fulton