On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 13:07 -0600, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Christian Theune wrote:
I remember that at the sprint we used to identify packages which are "always good". E.g. zope.interface is a declared no-brainer to add to your dependencies. The other two that keep popping up that we *might* wanna white-list are zope.schema and zope.component.
To whitelist zope.component would be quite interesting. As I recall, there was a time when all packages that depended on zope.component were required to be in the zope.app namespace.
Interesting, didn't know/remember that.
I don't object to the idea, though. We're using zope.schema and zope.component almost like language features.
Same here. -- Christian Theune · ct@gocept.com gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 7 · fax +49 345 1229889 1 Zope and Plone consulting and development