What's the actual issue with lxml? It's not that hard to compile it (I'm the person that compiles the official releases), just a little bit under-documented. On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 12:29 AM, Roger Ineichen <dev@projekt01.ch> wrote:
Malthe, Stephan
I decided after along night, trying to compile lxml on a windows box, that we will not use lxml and lxml based packages like z3c.form, z3c.template, z3c.macro etc at some of our windows servers.
We have to find a strategy to keep this packages free of lxml and implement the z3c.pt support in this packages in a different way.
I really like your lxml based z3c.pt work. It's nice and incredible fast.
What do you think about that?
I know it's a hugh amount of work, but I'm willing to help with the refactoring if you like.
Regards Roger Ineichen _____________________________ END OF MESSAGE
_______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
-- Sidnei da Silva Enfold Systems http://enfoldsystems.com Fax +1 832 201 8856 Office +1 713 942 2377 Ext 214