28 Mar
2006
28 Mar
'06
4:03 p.m.
--On 28. März 2006 10:55:29 -0500 Tres Seaver <tseaver@palladion.com> wrote:
- -1. This is explicitly the kind of change which our branch policy is supposed to disallow: we have no way of knowing what kind of damage we will be inflicting on people's applications if we replace the version of Five they deployed against with a newer one.
After *thinking* about the issue I follow the opinion of Chris and Tres that upgrading Five might be a bad idea Convinience in this case is not a reason to risk *any* backward compatibility issues. Sorry for bringing this issue but perhaps it was worth being discussed :-) Andreas