On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Tres Seaver <tseaver@palladion.com> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 01/10/2013 10:42 AM, Patrick Gerken wrote:
I am in favor of removing the trunks. People who do not want to switch to git can still get the trunk by pinning to a specific revision. I run a CI tool and it is broken already because apparently a trunk has been deleted already. Thats not a bug, thats why I run the CI Tool. Would be stupid if I continue to test a trunk not in use.
It isn't just CI: people may have projects running from SVN checkouts, which we break without warning (the Plone devs have been notorious for causing such breakage for years).
I still think breakage is better. If they're using trunk, without pinning a revision, it must be because they want the latest code. They won't get that from svn. This is a case where I think it's better to fail in an obvious way. Jim -- Jim Fulton http://www.linkedin.com/in/jimfulton Jerky is better than bacon! http://zo.pe/Kqm