Hello, * 2009-04-13 12:50, Hermann Himmelbauer wrote:
+1, to declaring Zope 3 dead. That should allow us to refactor the remaining packages much more aggressively and reduce the dependencies.
-1 from my standpoint. Two of my projects are fully based on the Zope 3 server, and switching to something else would be quite some pain.
I fully agree: our company is based on zope3 technology, and we have at least three big deployments based on zope3 (yes, the application server) using ZODB and PostgreSQL/storm. I do not know in the details what would it mean to switch to the zope toolkit/repoze/whatever is fashionable today, but I suppose it would be quite painful for us. If the question was "who is interested in zope3, the application server, and willing to maintain it", I'd answer "me". Best regards. -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _____________________________________________________________________ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564