-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Wichert Akkerman wrote:
On 12/29/09 16:25 , Martijn Faassen wrote:
Earlier this year we decided to refocus our efforts on the ZTK, a leaner, meaner Zope 3 with a different focus, which has code that we really use, no UI, and with cleaner dependencies.
I feel a disconnect here. As I see it the ZTK is not a 'leaner, meaner Zope 3'. Zope 3 is a modular application framework, while the ZTK is a small framework that can be used to build applications or applications frameworks. ZTK has no history since it never existed before (and still is only vapourware since it has no releases nor a release manager), so it does not have any backwards compatibility to worry about.
It seems that you want to have a 'ZTK+' which aims to be backwards compatible with Zope 3 but is somehow not Zope 3 itself. That is something that not everybody appears to be interested in judging by the lack of progress on Zope 3 itself, but if you want to pursue that I do not see any reason for you not to do that. But it should separate from the ZTK.
+1. Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver@palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAks6cmsACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ403QCgsxsE6Ug9ucN3b+S2EQCQS0GB XesAoI12dh6pdKXuSc1zhLj7HVRxJwOe =mDQ+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----