Laurence, thanks for the tip, exactly what I needed to know. :-) -Morten On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:30:29 +0000, Laurence Rowe <l@lrowe.co.uk> wrote:
See the discussion on plone-dev a while ago, "link integrity checking will make Plone 3.0 broken and dangerous". Worth trying with 2.9.8 at least.
Laurence
--On 18. August 2007 21:03:43 +0200 Andreas Jung <lists@zopyx.com> wrote:
--On 23. Juli 2007 08:53:32 +0200 Wichert Akkerman
<wichert@wiggy.net>
wrote:
Previously Andreas Jung wrote:
Having SecureMailhost as a replacement for MailHost would have been a nice addition to the Zope core..but you choose to go with your own implementation :->
If possible I want to try and move Plone 3.5 to zope.sendmail, which seems to be much cleaner than all the MailHost/SecureMailHost/DropMailHost/etc. products combined.
There is now TransactionalMailHost (on top of zope.sendmail)
<http://svn.zope.org/Products.TransactionalMailHost/>
providing transaction-aware Mailhost support + support for TLS/SSL (like in SecureMailHost - however it requires yet an unofficial zope.sendmail branch). I think this should make most Mailhost excrescences obsolete. If there is some functionalty missing I would be happy to add it (if it makes sense).
In addition the same functionality + asynchronous mail delivery (similar to Maildrophost but without having an external process) will be available as part of the standard Zope MailHost implementation in Zope 2.11.
Andreas
_______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )