28 May
2009
28 May
'09
12:44 p.m.
Matthew Wilkes wrote:
On 28 May 2009, at 12:39, Martijn Faassen wrote:
* Hm, I wonder whether it has something to do with local utilities.
I don't think I'd make this jump. I'd not be averse to a longer package name if it made it more explicit.
I wasn't primarily talking about a package name, but about the name for the concept (which can then be reflected class names, and a package name, if such a package is necessary). Regards, Martijn