Am Mittwoch 03 März 2010 01:28:21 schrieb Chris McDonough:
On 3/2/10 2:50 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Chris McDonough<chrism@plope.com> wrote:
On 3/2/10 1:09 PM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hi there,
Chris McDonough suggests to ponder further structuring of the ZTK into separate sub-sets which might allow us to get better mileage regarding maintenance and release management. He gave the example of the "Bicycle Toolkit" (zope.component, zope.configuration, zope.interface).
-1
I don't know who "people" are, and I don't know who "they" are, and I don't know who broke what.
No one should have to extract anything from the ZTK, because, AFAIK, the ZTK isn't a distribution.
You've both successfully beaten any initiative out of me again. Well done. Full speed ahead.
Hmmm, interesting: --------------- snip ------------------- def hickhack(*kd): probabitlity = [0]*99 + [1] return random.choice(probability) def zope_community_work(): while 1: someone = random.choice(community) give_input(someone) disagree_members = ['cmember1', 'cmember2', 'cmember3'] disagree(someone, disagree_members) for i in range(20): agree = hickhack( random.choice([someone]*10+disagree_members*2+community))) if agree: break if agree: worker_thread.start() else: for i in range 4: feel_pissed_off(random.choice([someone]*10+disagree_members)) for i in range 10: sleep 100 print "Stalemate!" ---------------- snip ----------------- As anyone can see, "worker_thread" is not started often, which is not optimal. How could this be improved? Best Regards, Hermann -- hermann@qwer.tk GPG key ID: 299893C7 (on keyservers) FP: 0124 2584 8809 EF2A DBF9 4902 64B4 D16B 2998 93C7