30 Apr
2010
30 Apr
'10
8:03 p.m.
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Hanno Schlichting <hanno@hannosch.eu> wrote:
If it is intended to be backwards compatible and seems to be so, I'd say go with 1.3. It sounds like a new package dependency, like we have had many others in minor releases.
Since when were new dependencies not considered features? -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at gmail.com> "Chaos is the score upon which reality is written." --Henry Miller