Sorry, forgot to Cc a couple of people involved in discussion and solution included in this mail. On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 19:33:56 -0800, Florian Friesdorf <flo@chaoflow.net> wrote:
Hi Matthew, Alan,
as discussed during ploneconf2011 I wrote the decorators: security.public security.private security.protected as successors to their declareX pendants.
All new code is fully covered (except a raise).
@all: please review AccessControl r123394 - r123399
security.protected('permission') returns a decorator and it should be ensured that all those decorators are actually called, i.e. that the @ isn't missing.
flo
-- Florian Friesdorf <flo@chaoflow.net> GPG FPR: 7A13 5EEE 1421 9FC2 108D BAAF 38F8 99A3 0C45 F083 Jabber/XMPP: flo@chaoflow.net IRC: chaoflow on freenode,ircnet,blafasel,OFTC