-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 10:29 pm, Stefan H. Holek wrote:
On 22.10.2004, at 14:38, Tres Seaver wrote:
Given that the change was required to implement a security fix, and without a reproducible test case for the reported breakage, I don't think we can credit the rumors. We *definitely* don't want to defer the security fix.
I still don't know what the security fix actually fixes, but that may well be my ignorance ;-). Your checkin message just mentions the removal of DWIMy code...
Actually, this is a point I wanted to make a long time ago. I believe there would have been less confusion all around (and some still lingers) if there had have been more information in the checkin message than "DWIMy code". DWIM only really has meaning to certain sets of "I". Richard -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQFBfCFgrGisBEHG6TARAkyNAJ43FD5zX6JLNfCsrEJ48jn3eKfyTwCY+HVT FzEaLBC9VAJHUDrC+Se/yw== =Oehq -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----