-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tres Seaver wrote:
Roger Ineichen wrote:
Hi Shane
Betreff: [Zope-dev] Zope.pipeline proposal
Hi all,
I've put up a draft of a zope.pipeline proposal:
http://wiki.zope.org/zope3/ZopePipeline
The proposal is intended to explain my thoughts on the subject more thoroughly. Do you know something about the performance of WSGI?
I whould be happy to see some perfomance tests comparing WSGI with other server concepts.
Sorry for following up to myself: I had meant to include links to the recent "songlist" thread which examined "raw" WSGI vs. various frameworks: - - The original, "raw WSGI" writeup: http://www.eflorenzano.com/blog/post/writing-blazing-fast-infinitely-scalabl... - - Martijn Faassen's Grok take: http://faassen.n--tree.net/blog/view/weblog/2009/01/10/0 - - Carlos de la Guardia's repoze.bfg writeup: http://blog.delaguardia.com.mx/index.php?op=ViewArticle&articleId=119&blogId... Please note the comparison Carlos makes between "raw" WSGI on his box, using the default Paste http server (1780 requests/second) vs. the repoze.bfg version with the same server (1060 requests/second). Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver@palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJpYPX+gerLs4ltQ4RAiihAJwNxxxiU3L8c2aBCyE1D6qu3CfHYQCgySlm LpYSFDGcULBueL/9+Oz2OjE= =4a6d -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----