1 Mar
2002
1 Mar
'02
10:38 a.m.
seb bacon wrote:
I think the use cases driving synchronisation requirements are not yet sufficiently understood. Agreed, it's a feature that many people need, but I get the impression it would be premature to include ZSyncer as is in Zope without more detailed planning. On the other hand, there is an argument which says, ZSyncer is a good product used by a lot of people, let's put it in Zope and deal with any issues after the event.
Yeah... maybe we need a standard "Zope Expansion Kit" that is a cohesive package of products that aren't in the Zope core, but are officially sanctioned and versioned and released alongside versions of Zope. -- Steve Alexander