--On 10. April 2008 01:57:12 +0100 Martin Aspeli <optilude@gmx.net> wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 9. April 2008 14:15:38 +0100 Laurence Rowe <l@lrowe.co.uk> wrote:
@everyone:
If we can all agree to use the same basic session and transaction management then we should probably push for it to be included as a sqlalchemy extension module.
I would be happy with such a solution. As said, I am not into the datamanager-building business and more interested in application-integration issues. The basic requirements I have for our applications:
- having the same session within one ZODB transaction (per thread) - need to get hold of the underlying database connection for a given session
I think that's very much the business collective.lead wants to be in. :)
You know what was first :-) Even with the collective.lead and z3c.zalchemy datamanager...still two instead of one :-) -aj